ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Research on Collaborative Governance
Decision-Making for Data Security in Innovation
Ecosystem under the Metaverse
More details
Hide details
1
School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China
Submission date: 2025-03-08
Final revision date: 2025-04-15
Acceptance date: 2025-05-12
Online publication date: 2025-06-18
Publication date: 2026-01-02
Corresponding author
Hua Zou
School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China
Pol. J. Environ. Stud. PEaI. 2025;1(1):121-143
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
With the rapid development of metaverse technology, data security governance within its innovation
ecosystem has become a critical challenge. This study explores data security collaborative governance
decision-making aimed at maximizing energy efficiency and minimizing environmental impact
throughout the data lifecycle. It proposes an innovative model for synergistic data security governance
and green sustainability, constructing an efficient, secure, and sustainable governance framework.
This provides theoretical support and practical guidance for the long-term healthy development of
the metaverse ecosystem. Against the backdrop of the metaverse, this paper constructs three game
models – Nash non-cooperative, Stackelberg leader-follower, and collaborative cooperative – based on
complex systems theory, collaborative governance theory, and differential game theory. From a dynamic
perspective, it examines the data security collaborative governance decision-making issues among three
key entities: core enterprises, research institutions, and the government. Finally, numerical simulation
analysis is conducted. The research findings reveal the following: (1) Government policy support
and innovation subsidies can enhance the willingness of core enterprises and research institutions to
engage in collaborative governance. Under government incentives and subsidies, the optimal benefits
for participating entities and the overall benefits of the ecosystem are improved. (2) The three game
mechanisms have heterogeneous effects on improving collaborative governance levels. When the initial
level of collaborative governance is low, all three mechanisms can drive its improvement. As the level
of collaborative governance increases, the leader-follower game under government incentives promotes
better collaborative governance outcomes in the innovation ecosystem. When the level of collaborative
governance is very high, only the collaborative cooperation mechanism can further enhance it.
(3) Strategies in the cooperative game not only involve optimal decision analysis but also emphasize
the promotion of ecosystem integration and optimization through synergistic mechanisms to achieve
whole-process, dynamic data security governance, while promoting efficient resource utilization and environmental sustainability, and building a synergistic governance model between data security
and green development.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
WANG M., YU H., BELL Z., CHU X. Constructing an Edu-Metaverse Ecosystem: A New and Innovative Framework. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES. 15, (6), 685, 2022.
2.
ZHANG Y., GENG Q., WANG X., SUN L., CHEN B. Thinking about Security Challenges in the Metaverse. Information and Communications Technologie. 18, (02), 72, 2024.
3.
WANG H., NING H., LIN Y., WANG W., DHELIM S., FARHA F., DING J., DANESHMAND M. A Survey on the Metaverse: The State-of-the-Art, Technologies, Applications, and Challenges. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL. 10, (16), 14671, 2023.
4.
WANG C., MU Q. Research on the Concept and Characteristics of Metacosmos Based on the Perspective of Internet Products. Haihe Media. (02), 23, 2024.
5.
ZHOU Z., CHEN Z., JIN X.-L. A review of the literature on the metaverse: definition, technologies, and user behaviors. INTERNET RESEARCH. 34, (1), 129, 2024.
6.
KONG W., YOU Z., LYU S., LV X. Multi-dimensional stereo face reconstruction for psychological assistant diagnosis in medicalmetaverse. INFORMATION SCIENCES. 654, 2024.
7.
WU D.metaverse Empowers Huaihe Culture Dissemination and Management. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 12, (01), 450, 2024.
8.
XU X.metaverse Empowers the Innovative Development Mechanism of the Ideological Education in Colleges and Universities. Journal of Education and Educational Research. 8, (3), 395, 2024.
9.
HUANG Y., LI Y. J., CAI Z. Security and Privacy in Metaverse: A Comprehensive Survey. Big Data Mining and Analytics. 6, (2), 234, 2023.
10.
DEDEHAYIR O., MäKINEN S. J., ORTT J. R. Innovation ecosystems as structures: Actor roles, timing of their entrance, and interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 183, 121875, 2022.
11.
YAGHMAIE P., VANHAVERBEKE W. Identifying and describing constituents of innovation ecosystems. EuroMed Journal of Business. 15, (3), 283, 2020.
12.
GUO T., LUO C., ZHANG H. Research on the evolution of regional military-civil S&T collaborative innovation ecosystem based on the multi-agent game. Science Research Management. 45, (04), 83, 2024.
13.
LI A. Q., CLAES B., KUMAR M., FOUND P. Exploring the governance mechanisms for value co-creation in PSS business ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management. 104, 289, 2022.
14.
HUANG S., ZHANG J. Research on Collaborative Governance of Digital Innovation Ecosystem:Based on Stochastic Evolutionary Game Model. Journal of Technical Economics & Management. (10), 52, 2024.
15.
KOZINETS R. V. Immersive netnography: a novel method for service experience research in virtual reality, augmented reality and metaverse contexts. Journal of Service Management. 34, (1), 100, 2023.
16.
QUEIROZ M. M., FOSSO WAMBA S., PEREIRA S. C. F., CHIAPPETTA JABBOUR C. J. The metaverse as a breakthrough for operations and supply chain management: implications and call for action. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 43, (10), 1539, 2023.
17.
KIM J. Advertising in the Metaverse: Research Agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 21, (3), 141, 2021.
18.
SCHöBEL S. M., LEIMEISTER J. M. Metaverse platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets. 33, (1), 12, 2023.
19.
GRANSTRAND O., HOLGERSSON M. Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation. 90-91, 102098, 2020.
20.
DIAS SANT´ANA T., DE SOUZA BERMEJO P. H., MOREIRA M. F., DE SOUZA W. V. B. The structure of an innovation ecosystem: foundations for future research. Management Decision. 58, (12), 2725, 2020.
21.
GUO J., GUO S., XU T. Research on Configuration Path of Multi-Agent Interaction Influencing Green Innovation in Innovation Ecosystem. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. 45, (02), 100, 2024.
22.
SU J., HE J. Governance of prepaid consumption in China's sports industry based on collaborative governance theory: theoretical framework, realistic dilemmas, and practical pathways. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 6, 2025.
23.
DING R. J., REN C. B., HAO S. L., LAN Q., TAN M. B. Polycentric Collaborative Governance, Sustainable Development and the Ecological Resilience of Elevator Safety: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model. SUSTAINABILITY. 14, (12), 2022.
24.
ULIBARRI N., EMERSON K., IMPERIAL M. T., JAGER N. W., NEWIG J., WEBER E. How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison. Policy and Society. 39, (4), 617, 2020.
25.
VON BERTALANFFY L. An Outline of General System Theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 1, (2), 134, 1950.
26.
PRIGOGINE I., LEFEVER R. Theory of Dissipative Structures. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1973.
27.
HAKEN H. An Introduction. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004.
28.
HOLLAND J. H. Complex Adaptive Systems. Daedalus. 121, (1), 17, 1992.
29.
YANG K. W., LI J. C., LIU M. D., LEI T. Y., XU X. M., WU H. Q., CAO J. P., QI G. X. Complex systems and network science: a survey. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS. 34, (3), 543, 2023.
30.
DOMéNECH J. L. U., NESCOLARDE-SELVA J. A., LLORET-CLIMENT M., GASH H., SEGURA-ABAD L. Structure, thermodynamics and information in complex systems. KYBERNETES. 52, (11), 5307, 2023.
31.
SUJITH R. I., UNNI V. R. Dynamical systems and complex systems theory to study unsteady combustion. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE. 38, (3), 3445, 2021.
32.
L Y. Research on the Governance Path of Online Public Opinion in Universities from the Perspective of Synergy Theory. Ideological & Theoretical Education. (06), 95, 2023.
33.
WU T., QUAN K. Research on the Symbiosis and Synergy of University Governance and Performance Management—On the Direction and Path of Improvement of University Performance Management in China. Journal of Xidian University(Social Science Edition). 31, (03), 99, 2021.
34.
WNAG S., HE L., LI X. Study on Crisis Learning Collaborative Governance Mechanism of Social Organizations Participating in Emergency Management. Journal of Hohai University(Philosophy and Social Sciences). 25, (03), 80, 2023.
35.
GAO H., MENG B., LIU J., DAI Z. Group pursuit-evasion differential games. Operations Research Transactions. 28, (03), 46, 2024.
36.
BELLMAN R. Dynamic Programming. Science. 153, 34 1957.
37.
PONTRYAGIN L. S. ON THE THEORY OF DIFFERENTIAL GAMES. Russian Mathematical Surveys. 21, (4), 193, 1966.
38.
LONG N. V. Pollution control: A differential game approach. Annals of Operations Research. 37, (1), 283, 1992.
39.
JI H., ZOU H., LIU B. Research on Dynamic Optimization and Coordination Strategy of Value Co-Creation in Digital Innovation Ecosystems. 2023.